Warning C6237
('zero' && 'expression') is always zero. 'expression' is never evaluated and may have side effects
This warning indicates that a constant value of zero was detected on the left side of a logical-and operation that occurs in a test context. The resulting expression always evaluates to false. Therefore, the right side of the logical-AND operation isn't evaluated. This language feature is referred to as "short-circuit evaluation."
Remarks
You should examine the right side of the expression carefully: Ensure that any side effects such as assignment, function call, increment, and decrement operations needed for proper functionality aren't affected by the short-circuit evaluation.
The expression (0 && n
) produces no side effects and is commonly used to selectively choose code paths.
Code analysis name: ZEROLOGICALANDLOSINGSIDEEFFECTS
Example
The following code shows various code samples that generate this warning:
#include <stdio.h>
#define INPUT_TYPE 0
int test();
// side effect: n not incremented
void f1( int n )
{
if(INPUT_TYPE && n++) //warning: 6237
{
puts("code path disabled");
}
else
{
printf_s("%d - n was not incremented",n);
}
}
// side effect: test() not called
void f2( )
{
if(INPUT_TYPE && test()) //warning: 6237
{
puts("code path disabled");
}
else
{
puts("test() was not called");
}
}
//side effect: assignment and function call did not occur
void f3( int n )
{
if(INPUT_TYPE && ( n=test() )) //warning: 6237
{
puts("code path disabled");
}
else
{
printf_s("%d -- n unchanged. test() was not called", n);
}
}
To correct this warning, use the following code:
#include <stdio.h>
#define INPUT_TYPE 0
int test();
void f1( int n )
{
if(INPUT_TYPE)
{
if(n++)
{
puts("code path disabled");
}
}
else
{
puts("n was not incremented");
}
}
void f2( )
{
if(INPUT_TYPE)
{
if( test() )
{
puts("code path disabled");
}
}
else
{
puts("test() was not called");
}
}
void f3( int n )
{
if(INPUT_TYPE)
{
n = test();
if( n )
{
puts("code path disabled");
}
}
else
{
puts("test() was not called");
}
}