Inside the Standard Bindings: NetTcp

Article
06/05/2006

Index for bindings in this series:

Today continues the series I started last week about the standard bindings. The previous article covered the BasicHttp binding. Today's article covers the NetTcp binding, which is going to be the popular out-of-the-box choice for communicating over an Intranet. The default configuration for TCP is faster than the configuration for HTTP, but intended only for WCF-to-WCF communication. You can open that up with a cost to speed, and you can add some WS-* specification features again at a cost to speed. There's more about this in the article I did for choosing transports and message encoders. Whereas the HTTP bindings tend to turn things on by default, the TCP binding tends to turn things off by default so that you have to opt-in.

I'm again going to use the Security.Mode settings on the binding as my primary pivot for talking about the binding elements that are produced by the binding. The available settings are no security, TCP/SSL security, SOAP security, and TCP/SSL security with SOAP credentials. Let me repeat the presentation disclaimer I used previously because it applies just the same this time.

I've cut down on the number of properties presented by eliminating duplicates between the binding settings and binding element settings. For instance, the XML reader quotas can be set on either the binding or the message encoder binding element, but I'm only going to show them on the message encoder. I've also omitted most of the security credential settings because they're very messy and you hopefully won't need to change them much.

When Security.Mode is set to None, there are three binding elements in the channel stack.

System.ServiceModel.Channels.TransactionFlowBindingElement
```
 TransactionProtocol: OleTransactions
```

System.ServiceModel.Channels.BinaryMessageEncodingBindingElement

 AddressingVersion: Addressing10 (https://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing)
MaxReadPoolSize: 64
MaxSessionSize: 2048
MaxWritePoolSize: 16
ReaderQuotas: 
  MaxArrayLength: 16384
  MaxBytesPerRead: 4096
  MaxDepth: 32
  MaxNameTableCharCount: 16384
  MaxStringContentLength: 8192

System.ServiceModel.Channels.TcpTransportBindingElement

 ConnectionBufferSize: 8192
ConnectionLeaseTimeout: 00:05:00
ConnectionPoolGroupName: default
HostNameComparisonMode: StrongWildcard
IdleTimeout: 00:02:00
ListenBacklog: 10
ManualAddressing: False
MaxBufferPoolSize: 524288
MaxBufferSize: 65536
MaxInboundConnections: 10
MaxOutboundConnectionsPerEndpoint: 10
MaxOutputDelay: 00:00:00.2000000
MaxPendingAccepts: 1
MaxReceivedMessageSize: 65536
PortSharingEnabled: False
Scheme: net.tcp
TeredoEnabled: False
TransferMode: Buffered

And there are a number of loose settings on the binding not otherwise covered by these elements.

 CloseTimeout: 00:01:00
EnvelopeVersion: Soap12 (https://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope)
MaxConnections: 10
Namespace: https://tempuri.org/
OpenTimeout: 00:01:00
ReceiveTimeout: 00:01:00
ReliableSession: 
  Enabled: False
SendTimeout: 00:01:00
TransactionFlow: False

These are the baseline settings and all of the variations are very similar so I'm not going to repeat the properties unless they're new or different.

Enabling Transport security adds a new binding element to perform the transform on the data stream. Note that unlike HTTP, the transport itself does not change and we do not integrate the transport security binding element with the transport binding element.

System.ServiceModel.Channels.TransactionFlowBindingElement
System.ServiceModel.Channels.BinaryMessageEncodingBindingElement
System.ServiceModel.Channels.WindowsStreamSecurityBindingElement
```
 ProtectionLevel: EncryptAndSign
```
System.ServiceModel.Channels.TcpTransportBindingElement

Setting Security.Mode to either Message or TransportWithMessageCredentials works almost the same as it did for HTTP. We take the channel stack corresponding to a Security.Mode of either None or Transport and add an additional binding element to perform SOAP security. The specific binding element used for security varies depending on both the Security.Mode setting and the security options that are being used.

Here's an example with Security.Mode set to Message:

System.ServiceModel.Channels.TransactionFlowBindingElement
System.ServiceModel.Channels.SymmetricSecurityBindingElement
System.ServiceModel.Channels.BinaryMessageEncodingBindingElement
System.ServiceModel.Channels.TcpTransportBindingElement

And here's an example with Security.Mode set to TransportWithMessageCredentials:

System.ServiceModel.Channels.TransactionFlowBindingElement
System.ServiceModel.Channels.TransportSecurityBindingElement
System.ServiceModel.Channels.BinaryMessageEncodingBindingElement
System.ServiceModel.Channels.SslStreamSecurityBindingElement
```
 RequireClientCertificate: False
```
System.ServiceModel.Channels.TcpTransportBindingElement

Note that in all of these channel stacks, the transactions binding element was included even though transactions are disabled by default. The same is not true for reliable messaging. A binding element only appears for reliable messaging if you specifically enable that feature by setting the ReliableSession property to true.

System.ServiceModel.Channels.TransactionFlowBindingElement

System.ServiceModel.Channels.ReliableSessionBindingElement

 AcknowledgementInterval: 00:00:00.2000000
EnableFlowControl: True
InactivityTimeout: 00:10:00
MaxPendingChannels: 128
MaxRetryCount: 8
MaxTransferWindowSize: 32
Ordered: True

System.ServiceModel.Channels.BinaryMessageEncodingBindingElement
System.ServiceModel.Channels.TcpTransportBindingElement

I used Security.Mode set to None for this example, but reliable messaging works with other security modes as well.

Next time: Inside the Standard Bindings: NetNamedPipe

Comments

Anonymous
June 05, 2006
During TechEd, the Connected Systems track (that's the WCF, Workflow, Infocard, and Biztalk teams) is...
Anonymous
June 07, 2006
Part 3 of the series detailing the standard bindings (Part 1 was on BasicHttp and Part 2 was on NetTcp)....
Anonymous
June 08, 2006
Only one more to go and I'll hit the magic 100 - only took three years to get there-). [More]
Anonymous
June 20, 2006
The comment has been removed
Anonymous
July 20, 2006
The last standard binding in the series is the NetPeerTcp binding for the PeerChannel transport. The...
Anonymous
July 29, 2006
I thought I'd share the binding inspector program I wrote a few months ago to explore the different settings...
Anonymous
September 14, 2006
Anoymous method
http://www.theserverside.net/tt/articles/showarticle.tss?id=AnonymousMethods
Generic...
Anonymous
October 08, 2006
The last standard binding in the series is the NetPeerTcp binding for the PeerChannel transport. The
Anonymous
January 03, 2007
I started this blog back in February hoping to produce a daily post throughout the entire month. I had
Anonymous
September 24, 2007
Only one more to go and I'll hit the magic 100 - only took three years to get there-). The Master
Anonymous
December 05, 2008
Only one more to go and I'll hit the magic 100 - only took three years to get there-). The Master, Mike Gunderloy (who everyone should read and I ripped off) has hit Number 900 (Congrats Mike!) and has announced a new contest Windows Vista Beta 2 has

Partager via

Inside the Standard Bindings: NetTcp

Comments

Ressources supplémentaires